Eagle Bay Resources NL

The Eagle Bay Story


 

Corporate Governance Statement

 Download Complete Corporate Governance Document (160.59 Kb)

In recognising the need for the highest standards of corporate behaviour and accountability, the directors of Eagle Bay Resource NL ("the Company") have adhered to the principles of corporate governance. A description of the main corporate governance practices is set out below. Unless otherwise stated, the practices were in place for the entire year.

Board of Directors

The Board of Directors of the Company is responsible for the corporate governance of the Company. The Board guides and monitors the business and affairs of the Company on behalf of the shareholders by whom they are elected and to whom they are accountable.

As the Board acts on behalf of shareholders, it seeks to identify the expectations of shareholders, as well as other ethical expectations and obligations. In addition, the Board is responsible for identifying areas of significant business risk and ensuring arrangements are in place to adequately manage those risks.

The primary responsibility of the Board include:

 

The responsibility for the operation and administration of the Company is carried out by the Directors, supported by senior professional staff. The Board ensures that this team is suitably qualified and experienced to discharge their responsibilities, and assesses on an ongoing basis the performance of the management team, to ensure that management's objectives and activities are aligned with the expectations and risks identified by the board.

The Directors of the Company are as follows:

Jonathan (Joe) Arnold Salomon (Executive Director) –a director since 04 February 2008

Mr Salomon (age 52), is a geologist with over 25 years of experience in the oil and gas exploration and production industry. He has worked in Australia and internationally and has been closely involved in technical and commercial management of projects for both small and large companies, as well as an independent consultant.  More recently Joe has also been involved in the corporate end of small company management, including new business development, negotiations of deals, acquisition evaluation, and strategy formulation to suit to a dynamic business environment.

James Benton Craib JP CPA (Chairman) – a director since 10th April 1991

Mr Craib (age 68) is an accountant who was previously responsible for the accounting and company secretarial functions of Eagle Bay Resources N.L., Falcon Minerals Ltd and Geographe Resources Ltd. He has had considerable experience as an accountant, mainly in the industrial and production sectors. His application of that experience to the requirements of the Company has been invaluable.

John Thomas Roy P.Eng (Director)

Mr Roy is a Professional Engineer with 30 years of technical, operational and management experience in the drilling sector of the oil and gas industry. He has managed complex operations in Canada, Australia, North Africa, Asia and Europe. Industry training and experience was firstly gained as an employee of Gulf Oil and Petro-Canada. The past 20 years John has worked as an independent consultant to the industry as owner and sole director of Seawell Engineering Ltd providing skills necessary to plan and execute exploration and development projects for over 20 client operating companies.

Linda Russell Bell BA ACA ACIS (Director and Company Secretary)

Ms Linda Bell is a Chartered Secretary and Chartered Accountant who has ten years experience in public listed companies.  Previously Ms Bell worked for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission and in the accounting profession.

Independent Directors

Under ASX guidelines none of the current board are considered to be independent directors. Mr Rechner is an executive director, Mr Craib is a former employee of the company and Mr Roy holds shares and options in the company. The ASX guidelines deem them not to be independent by virtue of their positions or former positions or security holdings. The Board is satisfied that the structure of the Board is appropriate for the size of the company and the nature of its operations and is a cost effective structure for managing the company.

Communication to Market & Shareholders

The Board of Directors aims to ensure that the shareholders, on behalf of whom they act, are informed of all information necessary to assess the performance of the Directors and the Company. Information is communicated to shareholders and the market through:

 

Board Composition

When the need for a new director is identified, selection is based on the skills and experience of prospective directors, having regard to the present and future needs of the Company. Any director so appointed must then stand for election at the next Annual General Meeting of the Company.

Terms of Appointment as a Director

The constitution of the Company provides that a Director other than the Managing Director may not retain office for more than three calendar years or beyond the third annual general meeting following his or her election, whichever is longer, without submitting for re-election. One third of the Directors must retire each year and are eligible for re-election. The Directors who retire by rotation at each annual general meeting are those with the longest length of time in office since their appointment or last election.

Board Committees

In view of the size of the Company and the nature of its activities, the Board has considered that establishing formally constituted committees for audit, board nominations and remuneration would contribute little to its effective management. Accordingly audit matters, the nomination of new Directors and the setting, or review, of remuneration levels of Directors and senior executives are reviewed by the Board as a whole and approved by resolution of the Board (with abstentions from relevant Directors where there is a conflict of interest). Where the Board considers that particular expertise or information is required, which is not available from within their number, appropriate external advice may be taken and reviewed prior to a final decision being made by the Board.

Remuneration

Remuneration and other terms of employment of executives, including executive directors, are reviewed periodically by the Board having regard to performance, relevant comparative information and, where necessary, independent expert advice. Remuneration packages are set at levels that are intended to attract and retain executives capable of managing the Company's operations.

The terms of engagement and remuneration of executive directors is reviewed periodically by the Board, with recommendations being made by the non-executive director. Where the remuneration of a particular executive director is to be considered, the director concerned does not participate in the discussion or decision-making.

Independent Professional Advice

Directors have the right, in connection with their duties and responsibilities as directors, to seek independent professional advice at the Company's expense. Prior approval of the Chairman is required, which will not be unreasonably withheld.

 

Share Trading

Dealings are not permitted at any time whilst in the possession of price sensitive information not already available to the market. In addition, the Corporations Act 2001 prohibits the purchase or sale of securities whilst a person is in possession of inside information.

Code of Conduct

The Board has approved a code of conduct which sets out the principles and standards which the Board, management and employees of the Company are encouraged to strive towards when dealing with each other, shareholders and the broad community.

A copy of the code may be viewed in the link Code of Conduct .   

External Auditors

In late 2003 the Board reviewed the appointment of the external auditor and conducted a tender process for the appointment of the external auditor. As a result the company sought and obtained shareholder approval and changed its external auditor to Stanton Partners. The previous auditors had been in place for approximately 5 years and had conducted thorough and professional audits however the Board considered that a change after a 5 year term would contribute to good corporate governance.